The Times: the ‘first’ edition reviewed
So there I had it. Perched on the corner of my bed at 5:30 this morning… Yesterday’s ‘first’ (or rather first test) edition of The Times. Some might say that flipping through a (new) paper and forming an opinion of it during the morning getting-ready-for-work routine may not be the best way to go about it. But hey, that’s how we consume media now… isn’t it? I’m sure Ray wrote about attention spans as well… Just battled to find it.
I like the front page.
Strong identity.
I’m hoping the Page 2 content about online and multimedia doesn’t feel as static when the team start producing.
Can we stop with all the Bullard?
Pictures. Pictures. Pictures. The Times has brilliant ones. And they’re used well. Mostly. Not too sure about the big ones at the bottom of pages.
The Star and The Citizen need better pics.
What’s with The Times‘ (and Sunday Times‘) obsession with Facebook?
An op-ed piece about Facebook???
Are four pages of business sustainable?
Nice to see integration of CareerJunction in job supplement. Very good move. People are thinking.
Dr Carr on the motoring page?!
Readers are going to want a condensed TV guide. Surely.
Why the L-shaped ads everywhere? Yellow pages a la This Day soon?
The news hole on pages with L-shaped ads looks like its exactly that. An afterthought.
BBK rocks.
Relatively bland sport section. Good photos though.
Where’s all the promised integration with online? Rip page two out and suddenly you’re left with a newspaper. Nothing more. Nothing less.
A different newspaper. But somehow not that different.
